matlab mex interface (MathWorks Inc)
MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier 
90
Structured Review
MathWorks Inc
matlab mex interface
Matlab Mex Interface, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+mex+interface/pmc11621031-195-14-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Matlab Mex Interface, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+mex+interface/pmc11621031-195-14-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab mex interface - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
90/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "Image processing tools for petabyte-scale light sheet microscopy data"
Article Title: Image processing tools for petabyte-scale light sheet microscopy data
Journal: Nature Methods
doi: 10.1038/s41592-024-02475-4
Figure Legend Snippet: a – b , run times of Tiff readers and writers for libtiff (MATLAB), tifffile (Python), and Cpp-Tiff versus the number of frames. c – d , run times of Zarr readers and writers, comparing the MATLAB interface of Zarr, native Zarr (Python), and Cpp-Zarr across different numbers of frames. In panels a-d , all images are in unit16 format with a frame size of 512 × 1,800 (xy), and the benchmark results are the absolute run times for Fig. . e – f , run times of Tiff readers and writers for libtiff (MATLAB) and Cpp-Tiff versus the number of CPU cores for a unit16 image stack of size 512 × 1,800 × 20,000. g – h , run times of Zarr readers and writers for the MATLAB interface of Zarr, and Cpp-Zarr versus the number of CPU cores for a unit16 image stack of size 512 × 1,800 × 20,000. i – k , data size and read/write times versus compression level for lz4 and zstd compressors for a uint16 image stack of size 512 × 1,800 × 30,000. The benchmarks were run ten times independently on a 24-core CPU computing node (dual Intel Xeon Gold 6146 CPUs). All 24 cores were allocated for panels a – d and i – k , and varying numbers of CPU cores were allocated for panels e – h . Data are shown as mean ± s.d. in panels a – h and j – k .
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: a , Performance gains of our Cpp-Tiff reader versus the conventional Tiff reader in MATLAB and tifffile reader in Python versus the number of frames in 3D stacks. b , Performance gains of Cpp-Tiff writer versus the conventional Tiff writer in MATLAB and the tifffile writer in Python versus the number of frames in 3D stacks. c , Performance gains of our Cpp-Zarr reader versus the conventional Zarr reader (MATLAB interface of Zarr) and native Zarr in Python versus the number of frames in 3D stacks. d , Performance gains of Cpp-Zarr writers versus the conventional Zarr writer (MATLAB interface of Zarr) and native Zarr in Python versus the number of frames in 3D stacks. The images have a uint16 frame size of 512 × 1,800 ( xy ) in all cases. The benchmarks were run independently ten times on a 24-core CPU computing node (dual Intel Xeon Gold 6146 CPUs). Data are shown as the mean ± s.d.
Techniques Used:
Related Articles
other:Article Title: Virtual Electrode Recording Tool for EXtracellular potentials (VERTEX): comparing multi-electrode recordings from simulated and biological mammalian cortical tissue Article Snippet: However, performance could be improved further by rewriting some of the Article Title: Image processing tools for petabyte-scale light sheet microscopy data Article Snippet: Our Tiff reader/writer leverages the capabilities of the libtiff library in C++ with the Article Title: Low‐rank inversion reconstruction for through‐plane accelerated radial MR fingerprinting applied to relaxometry at 0. 35 T Article Snippet: The Article Title: Global/local model order reduction in coupled flow and linear thermal-poroelasticity Article Snippet: Coupled flow and geomechanics computations are very complex and require solving large nonlinear systems.. Such simulations are intense from both runtime and memory standpoint, which strongly hints at employing model order reduction (MOR) techniques to speed them up.. Different types of Reduced-Order Models (ROM) have been proposed to alleviate this computational burden. Modification:Article Title: 3D ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY RECONSTRUCTIONS FROM SIMULATED ELECTRODE DATA USING DIRECT INVERSION t exp AND CALDERÓN METHODS Article Snippet: .. We modified a |